Slot Machine Jackpot Malfunctio N

According to the Nevada Gaming Commission, malfunctions often causes the player to believe a jackpot has been won but it doesn't mean you actually did. Gaming laws don't make casinos give the.

Slot Machine Malfunctions (Live Q&A) | Maine Slots in 2020

Ask the Slot Expert: Back on the slot malfunction/denied jackpot merry-go-round 4 March 2020 By John Robison, Slot Expert™. Here we go again. A casino refuses to pay a player a jackpot because of a slot machine malfunction and every story about the incident says you never know if a casino will really pay you when you win. With video slots, the common malfunction is that the machine shows a bunch of credits won, even when the player didn't line up the jackpot symbols. With electro-mechanical (physical-reel) slots it's the opposite: the jackpot symbols line up, but the machine says the player won nothing, or just a small amount.

During my Live Q&A Session, we discussed slot machine malfunctions. For example, Katrina took a selfie with a slot machine screen showing that she’d won a $43M voucher on a Sphinx Wild slot machine having a maximum jackpot of $6,500. This obvious slot machine malfunction made national news. Plus, Maryland slots in 2020.

Subscribe to my Professor Slots podcast at Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music | Amazon Audible | Gaana | Stitcher | Pandora | iHeart Radio | Tune-In | SoundCloud | RadioPublic | Deezer | RSS and everywhere else you find your podcasts!

Quick Episode Summary

  • Intro (0:00)
  • Multi-Million Dollar Slot Machine Malfunctions (Live Q&A) (0:58)
  • Maine Slot Machine Casino Gambling in 2020 (1:01:56)
    • Introduction
    • Relevant Legal Statutes on Gambling in Maine
    • Slot Machine Private Ownership in Maine
    • Gaming Control Board in Maine
    • Casinos in Maine
      • Non-Tribal Casinos in Maine
      • American Indian Casinos in Maine
      • Other Gambling Establishments
    • Payout Returns in Maine
    • Summary
    • Annual Progress in Maine
  • Closing (1:06:57)

Content from this Episode

  • Download the transcript.

Other Episodes by Professor Slots

  • Previous: Podcast Episode 79: Expect Up to Three Winning Slot Machines (Live Q&A) | Maryland Slots in 2020 – Except for my 5-pull slots strategy, after going through the work necessary to find winning slots machines, I discuss how many of them you should you expect to find in any one casino. How many? Expect up to three winning slot machines. And, odds are, they won’t be your favorite game theme. Plus, Maryland slots in 2020.
  • Next: Podcast Episode 81: Coronavirus vs. Casinos (YouTube Live) | Massachusetts Slots in 2020 – As coronavirus cases rise in the U.S., entertainment businesses will see fewer visitors as people avoid crowds. In this live Q&A session, we discuss what various levels of reduced attendance might mean for casinos. How might they choose to protect their gaming income and player’s health? Plus, Massachusetts slots in 2020.

Have fun, be safe, and make good choices!
By Jon H. Friedl, Jr. Ph.D., President
Jon Friedl, LLC

The cards are always stacked in favor of the casino. Casinos exist for one reason, and one reason alone: to take your money. They do it legally, even if it's under cloudy circumstances.

Consider the case of an Alabama man who put $5 into an electronic bingo machine at the Wind Creek Casino in Montgomery, Alabama. The casino is on tribal land operated by the Poarch Band of Creek Indians. To the gambler's amazement, 'several noises, lights, and sirens were activated' when the machine announced that Jerry Rape had hit The Big One. The bingo machine indicated a jackpot of $459,000, then $918,000, and finally settled on a 'payout multiplier' of $1,377,000, according to the gambler's lawsuit.

The casino took Rape's payout ticket and made him wait for about 24 hours before saying no dice. He wasn't getting the monster payout. The machine, he was told by the tribe's casino, had 'malfunctioned.' (PDF)

It gets worse

The gambler sued the casino in the tribal court of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians. But the suit was dismissed. The court declared that sovereign immunity prevailed—that the tribe was an independent nation and immune from being sued.

Slot

'They said they were immune to any kind of fraud that I made in the complaint,' the gambler's attorney, Matt Abbott, told Ars in a telephone interview. 'They said rules don't apply to them, [and] 'have a nice day.'

Advertisement

Unable to lodge a claim in tribal court, Rape rolled the dice with Alabama's state courts and sued the tribe there. On Friday, seven years after Rape thought he had hit the jackpot, the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that Rape could not sue the tribe in state court—the proper venue was tribal court. That's because the Poarch Band of Creek Indians is a nation of itself, and that's where disputes occurring on that land should be litigated, the court found.

The Alabama high court noted that it found itself in a 'Catch-22' of sorts. It said it couldn't decide the dispute even if the tribe wasn't entitled to sovereign immunity.

'The activity out of which Rape's claim arose, however, was gambling. If it occurred on land within the regulatory and adjudicative jurisdiction of the State of Alabama, that activity was illegal. Specifically, that land is located in Elmore County and, therefore, is not located in one of the counties in Alabama where even the game commonly and traditionally known as bingo is permitted,' the court ruled. (PDF)

It is well established that this Court will not aid a plaintiff seeking to recover under an illegal contract but, instead, will simply leave the parties where it finds them.

This is the third time we've seen a gambler hit an enormous jackpot only to be told that it won't be paid because the jackpot was a result of an electronic 'malfunction.'

Meanwhile, the Alabama gambler's attorney, Abbott, told Ars that his client's legal avenues have now been exhausted. 'It's over,' he said.

$100 Slot Machine Jackpots

The tribe said the Alabama high court did the right thing. 'We are pleased that the Court affirmed the ruling in favor of the Tribe,' spokeswoman Sharon Delmar said.